Analysis Of The Characteristics Of Online Fashion Shoppers Marketing Essay

Analysis Of The Characteristics Of Online Fashion Shoppers Marketing assayOnline bearing obtain is a segment of e-commerce that has some(prenominal) a fully grown consumer groceryplacebase and an ever-progressing curve of engineering asseverateation development. The elements that go into trade look for for obtain online involve dickens primary(prenominal) aspects the consumer and applied science, as discrete yet cogitate elements. There has been much adjudicate conducted which explores both facets, and interrogation which has attempted to pull in the impact of one ara on the antithetic. Consumer deportment in the online securities industry has typically been continueed as find outd mainly by the occurrenceor of convenience. If it is convenient, past the consumer entrust favor online obtain. engineering has been most often cited to influence consumer obtain way if it is easy to practice. Both the consumer and the engine room element father undergone an maturation that is not yet finished in terms of defining foodstuff elements. As engineering develops, so too that influence consumer behavior, which in unit of ammunition influences technology, and so on. Various consumer models devote evolved to apologize online shop behavior, and for the purports of the pursuit explore thesis, both the utilitarian and hedonistic motivation models atomic number 18 referenced and applied. Additionally, mixed technology acceptance models fool been posited as antecedents in defining consumer behavior for online shopping. A description of some reciprocally utilized models is provided in this thesis, though no one model is utilized here. However, elements of the technology acceptance models that argon fairly ubiquitous across the models argon utilized, those chiefly being the comprehend tranquillity of mapping (of technology) and the perceived earn to the consumer of utilizing the technology (here, online expression shopping). This look thesis looks at psycheal characteristics as they influence various behaviours and attitudes toward online form shopping. A survey head wordnaire is put ond as the selective randomness gathering instrument. Responses argon storyed as frequencies and cross-tabulations. A dealion on the findings is offered in both the section on the analysis and in the conclusion of this thesis. CHAPTER 1 initiation C erstpts, Issues, and DefinitionsStatement of PurposeThe purpose of this research paper is to examine the attitudes and characteristics of masses who economic consumption the cyberspace to eng get on with in online-shopping to determine if there argon someoneal or demographic factors that influence online room shopping. Various technology acceptance models ar examined and utilized to elucidate those factors of the consumer that drive their online fashion shopping behavior ( eats, Dai, Zhang, 2007).The importance of this issue has its effectations in the outgrowth prevalence in web-establish consumerism. Research into online consumer shopping behavior operates to focus on either the technology aspect or the consumer aspect. These two tone-beginninges are but mirrors of each other, with data from each aspect used to tweak selling and technology elements.darn a great deal of online shopping research concerns the web embrasure and how it is perceived by users and how that influence their buying behavior, there is similarly a great deal of research on consumer behavior, including demographics. The relevance of this particular research project approaches the topic from the consumer end, with and through examining their actual someoneal attributes and characteristics, with influencing factors as undercoat in the technology aspect.Consumers, in this case online fashion shoppers, have choices in their shopping preferences, which is of primary interest to retailers and marketers. The factors which influence their buying decisions from front- end recognition of a need or desire to back-end fulfillment through market choice and procurement stooge be elucidated through examining the attributes and characteristics of these consumers (Cho Fiorito, 2008). This data whitethorn inform not only the identification of disregards in consumerism, but also possible applications for web- found marketing applications.The outgrowth decade of the 21st century shows a domination of mesh activity in mevery aspects of in advance(p)ized cultures, where business to consumer marketing has proliferated (Dennis, Harris, Sandju, 2002). As knowledge increases regarding the factors that influence online fashion consumers, business toilette check both the consumer characteristics and the technology aspects required to meet those consumer characteristic-driven choices (Kim Forsythe, Factors Affecting Adoption of harvest-home Virtualization Technology for Online Consumer Electronics shop, 2009).The result is an optimal online fashio n shopping environment that recognizes and adjusts to the influencing elements of its node base. This research paper go forth explore those characteristics of the online fashion shopper, in aim to interrupt inform both business and technology requirements in this market segment. A comprehensive literature review on the topic is offered to gain the topic. A research strategy for examining the topic is effrontery, with relevant design elements in the data-gathering instrument chosen for data acquisition. A conclusion is provided to juicylight the main points of this research paper and to synthesize the topics.Research QuestionThe research question for this thesis project is posed thuslyWhat are the attributes and characteristics of online fashion shoppers that influence their utilization of online shopping sites?1.3 Objectives of ResearchThe objectives of the research focus on the following areasTo examine the characteristic of online habilitate customer.To explore the attitud e of hatful toward online clothing purchasing.To identify the factors for the use of online fashion shopping of computer-skilled the great unwashed.To suggest areas of future research for online shopping that are informed by factors of technology acceptance models.The first two objectives of this research focus on consumer attributes. The third objective lead be elucidated through exploring technology acceptance models. The closing objective synthesizes the instruction gained from this research project.1.4 Statement of General Topic Area Online Fashion Shoppers, delimitOnline shoppers are those consumers which have the following general characteristics which potbelly inform the expression of the particular consumerThey are computer-saavy (Dennis, Harris, Sandju, 2002).They have access to utilize a pass account that whole shebang with internal payment portals, such as a credit card, bank account, or paypal (G of advance(predicate)smith Goldsmith, 2002).They seek expanded choice (Jayawardhena, Wright, Dennis, 2007).They seek convenience (Dixon Marsden, 2005).Psychologically, they seek immediate gratification (Zhou, Dai, Zhang, 2007).They shop for fashion items on the profit as a major shopping venue (Kim Kim, 2004).These generalities flush toilet be informed through further analysis in any one characteristic area. However, for conceptionual purposes of this research paper, the online fashion shopper is a consumer of the modern age, encompassing the areas of technology in the internet age (Jayawardhena, Wright, Dennis, 2007).*BLANK foliate BETWEEN CHAPTERS*CHAPTER 2 Literature Review2.1 Fashion is a gendered implementPsychological antecedents exist in the research literature for online consumer behavior, yet essentially there is the issue of how fashion is perceived as a concept and how that conceptualisation affects heathenish and societal perceptions. This is important to understand for its influences upon consumer behavior and the ident ification of consumer attributes.Fashion An OverviewIn the modernized world of first world countries, intercommunicate the typical person on the street what is meant by fashion may likely get a response that has something to do with the way throng dress. Others may see fashion as a trend in an of itself, as things pass in and out fashion. Yet commonly held thinkings well-nigh fashion do indeed refer to the idiosyncratic outward accouterments that humans utilize to communicate their presence in the neighborly sphere. These may be clothing, accessories like jewelry, or even items like tattoos or other types of body art. In essence, the make of a modern identity for the individual involves blending fashion with current favorable more(prenominal)s and attitudes (Entwhistle, 2000).Mears (2008) describes the concept of fashion in terms of how society chooses to communicate popular musical themes of fashion through the use of fashion models on the catwalk. Here, posits Mears, th e fashion model is constructed based on the rootless norms of society, which are subject to the instability in sexual activity ideations of society, and the whims of the cultural occupation markets. The instability between the rigid structures of the marketplace and an impossible idealized femininity are displayed in modern culture through the idea of the fashion model (Mears, 2008). Fashion, then, is not separate from the body. The body (self) and the items that dress the body are one they are a reflection of the idea of sexual activity in society (which is variable) and the carrefour of cultural variances in the marketplace. Fashion, in essence, is the product of cultural ideas and practices almost gender, place, fond norms, and institutions.Concept of GenderGender does not plainly refer to the male/ pistillate dyad, in which stereotyped ways of playacting are considered to be socially acceptable at any given point in social time. It is not only role ideals, though th at is part of it the concept. Gender also encompasses issues of race, sexuality, geographic and spatial time and place, and social class as well (Healey, 2006). Gender also refers to sexual orientation, which may differ from ones biological reality.Buss (2010) proclaims that gender refers to mate selection, encompassing ideas of somatogenetic attractiveness, parental investment, reproductive mental ability, and asymmetries between the maternal and paternal role. Those characteristics that were valued more by males had to do with reproductive capacity, drama those characteristics valued by women dealt with imaginativeness acquisition. The cross cultural references can illuminate the ways in which the gender phenomena causes people to behave the role of fashion, as one aspect of gender relations demonstrates the various cultural ways in which people may behave in order to choose suitable mates (Buss, 2010).Gender, as recognized as encompassing social ideas about male/female relat ionships and roles, as well as referring to the individual selection of mates based on male/female desirable characteristics, can inform the manner in which fashion, as a modern notion, is influenced by role stereotypes and evolutionary reproductive run forencies.Consider the role of the female model on the catwalk. found on a construction of floating norms of society and marketplace vagaries, this idea of the female is exceedingly sexualized, appealing to the male value of reproductive capacity in mate selection. The female idealization of the model is a colloquy not only to men, but also of women, stating that the ideal mate of the woman is one that can provide resources. It, the model of the catwalk fashion model, encompasses the evolutionary, social, and cultural colloquy desired by males, and recognized as such by females, through the manipulation of the fashion construct as a media tool of conference between the sexes (Entwhistle, 2000).Fashion, therefore, is essentiall y a gendered practice. Indeed, this is the practice of dialogue the communication of ideas, values, desires, social ideas, and cultural norms is offered through the gender-infused evolutionary and anthropological elements of roles, mates, reproduction, and species survival (Buss, 2010). The example of the fashion model is one easy way to see the transfer of gender ideas. Male-valued ideas and female-valued conceptualizations are quickly viewed through sampling the fashion of a culture. colleague selection (sexuality, reproduction) as one aspect of the gender phenomenon, is provided through the media of fashion communication, which differs depending on time, place, and cultural influences.2.2 Online Consumers AttributesSorce, Perotti and Widrick (2005) studied age differences in online buying behavior. They studies ccc college students and staff from a United States university and looked for trends in attitudes based on age differences toward online shopping. Their results indicate that aged(a) and younger shoppers buy equally, though younger shoppers and particularly first time online shoppers tend to be more varied in the products they buy, while older shoppers tend toward specificity in their buying behavior. Additionally, age differences in buying behavior can help retailers predict age-related product acquire variance, with older shoppers tending to barter for family-related items such as toys and sporting goods at a greater rate than younger shoppers, while younger shoppers tended to purchase items like music, technology, and health-related services as a greater rate than older shoppers. This age difference in product segmentation reflects a broader trend in generational internet use. Jones and Fox (2009) report that the 18-32 year old age group are more tech- apprehension digital natives engaging in a wide range of internet activities, while age groups to a higher place 32 years tend to use the internet for banking, shopping, and research (Jones Fox, 2009).Gender differences have also been researched as indicators of online shopping preferences (Kim Forsythe, Factors Affecting Adoption of increase Virtualization Technology for Online Consumer Electronics Shopping, 2009). The use of internet related activities has traditionally been apportioned to a male-dominated sphere (Jayawardhena, Wright, Dennis, 2007). Women perceive a higher level of risk in online shopping than men (Garbarino Strahilevitz, 2004). The trend from a male-dominated, pro-risk approach to internet use is changing, and women are fast closing the perceived gender gap in online utilization (Kim Forsythe, 2009). The male/female difference may be different depending on culture and sexual orientation.Weiser (2000) studied the factors that influence the use of the internet by women. A large survey sample of males and females was used to rate user preferences for internet use. Men preferred to use the internet for culture and leisure, while women preferred to use it for communication and assistance with academics (Weiser, 2000). Wolf (2004) suggests that women tend to use emotion in their utilization of the internet, reflecting a stance that gender-based market psychology may inform retailers on how to construct their online portals. Rodgers and Harris (2003) report that collar areas affect both men and womens use of e-commerce, those being emotion, trust, and convenience. Men report satisfaction with using the internet in these trinity area, while women report dissatisfaction in these same areas (Rodgers Harris, 2003).Income level is also electropositively correlated with online shopping utilization, regardless of gender or age differences (Zhou, Dai, Zhang, 2007). Forsythe and Shi (2003) posit that high internet users tend to have high incomes. They note that perceptions of risk in internet shopping tend to decrease as income level increases. Internet users tend to have more disposable income, which is a reflection on the fact that they use the internet at all. Bucy (2003) reports that internet use is lowest among individual(a) mothers, those in lower socioeconomic groups, and older low-income groups.Education has been reported to have an effect on online activity, though these reports have been mixed, ranging from no effect to increase effect of education on online activity (Zhou, Dai, Zhang, 2007). Oftentimes college users simply have greater access to internet resources than other groups, suggesting that simple access as a fundamental resource may impact the utilization of online e-commerce (Seock Norton, 2007). Mahmood, Bagchi, and get over (2004), however, suggest that education is not an influencing factor in internet use, while the factors of trust and economic conditions are.Convenience is often cited in existing studies as a factor involved in online shopping (Demangeot Broderick, 2007). Park and Kim (2003) discuss the depersonalization of the shopping experience by the utilization of e-comm erce. They note that users report a high utility in ease of gathering information and finding good quality through well-designed retail web interfaces, suggesting an overall satisfaction with the e-commerce as found in the factor of convenience. This view is gainsay by Jayawardhena, Wright, and Dennis (2007), who find that convenience is not a principally propel factor for online shopping indeed, they report that the chief factors that influence online shopping are prior purchase and gender.Trust is another factor involved in online shopping behaviour and speaks to the attributes of the consumer. Women tend to be less trust of internet shopping than men, and younger people tend to be more trusting of utilizing the internet than older people (Dennis, Harris, Sandju, 2002). Connolly and Bannister (2008) state that the consumers trust in online shopping relates to the perceived integrity of the retailer, and the perceived competence of the retailer. Integrity is based upon a social perception while competence is based upon a technological perception.Internet retailers who seek to engender trust in their customers must incorporate the e-commerce store front with the latest information technology feature with the latest consumer marketing research. How people choose to embrace technology is also an important consideration in internet marketing to online shoppers (Forsythe Shi, 2003). This element can be explained through the examination of various technology acceptance theories.2.3 Technology borrowing TheoriesTechnology acceptance theories attempt to explain how and why people come to adopt and use new-sprung(prenominal)born technology. While there are several models that exist to explain this phenomenon, this paper go away report on four theories to place online fashion shoppers attributes within, to help illuminate the factors involved in explaining the utilization of online shopping. The factors of technology that influence online shoppers in how the y utilize the internet will be analyzed through the survey instrument of this research project.Online Shopping Acceptance ModelZhou, Dai, and Zhang (2007) constructed an Online Shopping Acceptance Model, illustrating elements of the internet (technology) and attributes of the consumer, to show a flow operation model incorporating the elements of motivation, innovation, perception, shopping orientation, normative beliefs, attitude, online experience, shopping intention, and satisfaction, resulting in the event of online shopping. This is an inclusive model, and draws together the salient marketing elements regarding online shopping. In the Zhou et al. (2007) study, the resulting construction of the OSAM offer future researchers a holistic way to approach the area of online shopping.Theory of Reasoned ActionThe theory of reasoned actions (TRA) was presented by Fishbein and Ajzen in 1980. The origins of the theory stem from the study of social psychology. This field attempts to explai n why attitude may affect behavior. TRA seeks to explain and even imagine behaviour based on the beliefs, attitudes and intentions of people. An individuals behavior is a result of these three factors, according to the theory of reasoned actions model. According to Fishbein and Ajzen (1980), behaviour is driven by behavioural intention. A persons intentions stem from the attitude toward the behavior. Moreover, the behavior in improver to the native norms, are also affected. During ones lifetime, various beliefs can impact attitudes. descriptive beliefs can be formed by personal experience, or gained by obtaining outside information. More generally, the more likable an object/concept is, the better the sense of touch regarding it, and the more unlikeable an object is, the more negative the feeling is regarding it. As a consequence, an individual makes an assessment about the outcomes of various behaviors. Indeed, the person will evaluate the desirability of these outcomes and ass ociate either a positive or negative association with it.The TRA model. This model reports behavior as a consequence of intention to behave, which is prompted by the attitude toward the subjective norm. (adapted from Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980).Technology Acceptance ModelThe theory of reasoned actionwas modifiedand adapted into a new model, called the technology acceptance model (TAM). Whereas the TRA model usesbehaviourand subjective norm, the TAM uses measures of technology acceptance. These measures are how people perceive the ease of use of the technology, and how useful theyperceiveit to be. These two acceptance measures are meant to inform on the intention of people to actually use the new technology. Ease of use refers to the amount ofeffortthepersonperceives must be spent in using the technology, and usefulness refers to the perception of the person that the technology willbenefitthem in some way (Vijayasarathy, 2004). The following draw illustrates the TAMhttp//www8.org/w8-p apers/1b-multimedia/ coordinated/im_03.gifSource Sodergard et al. (1999). distribution of blueprints ModelDiffusion of Innovations theory is the swear out by which new ideas and technology spread throughout society. inside tells us how fast and why new ideas spread in the manner in which they do (Rogers, 1962 2003, pp. 5-7). The communication process through which a new idea or technology is accepted by consumers is the dispersion rubric. The rate of diffusion is the speeding by which that innovation spreads from one consumer to another. Consumers, by definition, become so through acquire about new products, trying them out, and either accepting them or not. earlier methods of getting market knowledge to consumers was through utilizing the tools of mass marketing, which is essentially a catch-all process, and is both time-intensive and expensive. Following mass marketing came the use of market strategies that set and targeted heavy users of a product (Bass, 2004). This has si nce evolved into consumer-specific, early adopter model of consumer behavior marketing. The Diffusion of Innovations theory tells us how this happens (Im, Mason, Houston, 2007, pp. 63-66).The following diagram provides a shooting of DOI theoryhttp//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0f/Diffusionofideas.PNG/330px-Diffusionofideas.PNGAs the diagram shows, an innovation has adopter categories. These categories are based upon a consumers innovativeness, or likeliness to use the innovation, which can be plotted on an S-curve (Rogers E. , 1962 2003). Early adopters have more innovativeness than laggards or late adopters. As more consumers adopt the technology (shown in blue), the market share (shown in yellow) will reach market saturation diffusion of innovation in consumer behaviors thus tells us that once an innovation spreads to a certain point in the consumer base, the market becomes double-dyed(a) (Rogers, 1962 2003) (Wikipedia, 2010).Four Key Elements of Diffusion of Innovations TheoryDOI theory harnesses the concepts of innovation, communication, time, and social system (the target arena), to explain how and at what rate new ideas be active through society and from person to person (or more appropriately, consumer to consumer) (Rogers, 1962 2003). One can imagine the spread of information about a new idea one person learns of it, tells another person, that person tells another person, and so on until the innovation idea is spread throughout society. In marketing, this concept works on consumer behavior at a micro-level someone tries out a new product, tells another person about it, that person tries it and tells another person about it, and so on. Often we here about these ideas, as found in common phrases such as word of mouth is the stovepipe advertising, or put your money where your mouth is, and one good turn deserves another these types market-related processes where the consumer is the biggest advertiser is one example of product/idea diffusion as found in DOI theory (Solomon, 2004, p. 174).To reiterate, the key elements of Diffusion of Innovations Theory areInnovation the change, the idea, the product that is being launched.Communication the methods through which the information about the idea are being disseminated.Time the process by which a person (consumer) makes a decision about the innovation, and the speed by which the innovation is choose by others.Social System the adhesive arena of people engaged in seeking a common goal.(Rogers, 1962 2003, pp. 17-24). ratiocination Making in Diffusion of Innovation TheoryA consumer (this report is focusing on consumer behavior) is exposed to an innovation, whether it be a new product or service, and must make a decision about it will they use it, like it, reject it? The process of decision make in innovations follows a three step modelOptional Innovation decision the decision about the innovation is made by a consumer who is somehow different from other consumers i n the same social system. collective Innovation Decision the decision about the innovation is made by all the consumers within the particular social system.Authority-Innovation Decision the decision about the innovation is made by one consumer, a leader, an authority form or figures who are in a position of power.(Rogers, 1962 2003, p. 372).Some types of decisions are dependent upon decisions made about other innovations. For example, a housewife will not be able to trial a new clean product until her local store makes the decision to stock the product. That is called a particular decision innovation (Persichitte, Tharpe, Caffarella, 1999).Adoption Process in Innovation Decision MakingWithin DOI theory, there is a decision making process as generally outlined above, as well as a finer decision making process consisting of five stages, know as the Adoption process. The following model details the Adoption processhttp//www.fidis.net/typo3temp/tx_rlmpofficelib_8cb7cf257e.png(Royer, 2010).Knowledge the consumer does not have enough information to make a decision, and may not yet be inspired to seek the information. opinion the consumer is actively engaged in seeking information about an innovation.Decision the consumer is weighing the pros and cons of the innovation, and may have trouble making a decision. implementation the consumer is trialing the innovation, and determining its usefulness.Confirmation the consumer is finalizing their decision about the innovation.(Rogers, 1962 2003, p. 83).This is a highly projectile process, and while the consumer is moved through the stages, this process may rely as much on psychological inputs and variances as it does on hard falsifiable facts (Kleijnena, Leeb, Wetzels, 2009).Factors Affecting Adoption of InnovationsThe speed at which an innovation is accepted/adopted depends upon the category of the adopter. A consumer can be a respected person and thus with a vast social network to draw upon, the adopter(s) can be a group of consumers who will heavily use the innovation, or the adopter can be one of the early variety who is influenced by positive messages about the innovation. Through influencing the bridal process, consumer behavior can be directed toward moving the innovations acceptance toward a place on the DOI curve known as critical mass, where the innovations use and adoption are self-sustaining (Rogers E. , 2004).Innovations have inherent characteristics that act upon a consumers choice of adoption or rejection. First the innovation has some type of relative wages over its predecessors second is that the innovation has the quality of compatibility to be utilized in the consumers life the innovation must be sufficiently complex but not too complex for the consumer to use the innovation must be able to be trialed with relative ease and finally the innovation that has high visibility to others is more likely to be adopted by coadjutor consumers (Tornatsky Klein, 1982, pp. 28-30). Appl icable to online fashion shopping, one can meet the conceptual requirements of innovations, in that online shopping is more convenient than visiting brick and mortar stores, online fashion shopping for those that prefer to do their fashion shopping over the internet is highly compatible with the consumers preferences, online shopping for the skilled computer user is very ease to use, and the prevalence and spread of e-commerce makes online fashion shopping an attractive venue for the savvy fashion shopping population who use computers.Consequences of DecisionsWhen a consumer makes a decision, there will be some type of consequence or outcome (Burt, 1987). Three categories characterize the nature of these consequencesDesirable vs. UndesirableDirect vs. validatingAnticipated vs. Unanticipated(Hubner, 1996) (Rogers E. , 1962 2003).A consumers choice to use one product over another may have undesirable, indirect, and unanticipated consequences, such as the choice to buy fashion apparel online rather than at the locally based brick and mortar store. Where the brick and mortar store supports the local economy in which it exists, providing jobs and taxes, the internet based retailer may be not locally based, thus taking away monies from the local shops that may suffer economically.2.4 outline of the LiteratureThe literature thus presented has focused on the concepts of fashion and gender, attributes of online consumers, and technology acceptance models. While e-commerce is a product of the internet age, the field of research regarding online fashion shopping behavior and attributes of online fashion shoppers clearly leaves room for discovery. At best, the antecedents in the research literature offer a way to out front in the research through exploring the new face of consumerism in the age of technology.The idea that is emerging in research into online shopping is that new models are coming to the forefront which offers a holistic picture of the factors that inf luence the final outcome of product/service purchase. On one hand there is the consumer, and on the other hand there is technology. In between the two facets are many influencing factors, which through the survey questionnaire designed for this research, some of those issues will be examined.CHAPTER 3 Research StrategyConceptualization of the IssueThe purpose of this chapter is to define the methodology used to evaluate issues associated with online fashion shoppers. Given the growing prevalence of e-commerce and the spread of available internet to populations across the world, the nature of the consumer as a field of study is of high relevance. The attributes and characteristics of the consumer may change with time, place, and influencing social climates. While various technology acceptance models exist to explain how people come to adopt/accept the use of technology, the particular factors within th