Gabriel Alvarez Essay

The ninth Circuit believed that because respondents donning and doffing is an vital and necessary preliminary bodily process included by respondents principal work activity, all activities performed afterward such as walk accordingly occur during the principal workday and is compensable. The court rejected the supplicants argument that Section 4(a)(1) of the Portal Act makes clear that the walk of life epoch at issue is not compensable even if it follows apparel changing.The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the employees of IBP, Inc. because go underting on protective gear and walking to and from changing areas are inbuilt and inborn to the jobs principal activities. ISSUE(S) The issues presented to the Supreme Court for determination were whether the time spent walking between donning and doffing areas and workstations, and the time spent waiting to put on protective equipment were compensable under the FLSA as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act.The Supreme Court held that time spent walking following position on protective equipment and prior to removing protective equipment was compensable under the FLSA as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act REASON(S) The Court held that any activity that is integral and indispensable to a principal activity is itself a principal activity under section 4(a)(1) of the Portal-to-Portal Act.